‘Supergirl’ doesn’t live up to potential

I loved “Superman” (2025), and I was so excited for “Supergirl.” Milly Alcock is adorable and a great actress. She’s perfectly cast as Supergirl, aka Kara Zor-El. Her naughty pup, Krypto, is also adorable. They’re a spunky superhero duo! What’s not to love? Well, unfortunately there were multiple things about this movie that I did not love.

Don’t get me wrong – I didn’t hate it. It was entertaining, and it had its moments. But it could have been so much better! For starters, Kara is not a great role model for young girls, which is fine, but if you are thinking this is a cute movie to take your little girl to see, you might be disappointed to find out that Kara is less of a fun party girl and more of a full-blown alcoholic. I actually don’t mind this being part of the story except that they don’t really address her addiction in a meaningful way.

There is also lots of violence, and I know that’s par for the course, but I’m talking about massacres of whole families by space pirates who also abduct and imprison teen girls to be their “brides.” It isn’t the most feel-good, family-friendly summer flick, is what I’m saying. (And “Supergirl” doesn’t address human trafficking in any meaningful way either.)

Having said that, I am going to give a lot more spoilers after the following photo, so if you don’t want the movie spoiled, come back later.

I am sad to be giving this film a somewhat negative review, because I really, really wanted to love it. Women-centered films are often unfairly criticized, even before they’ve been released. Like “The Marvels” (2023) there was some anti-women hatred aimed at “Supergirl,” picking on Alcock’s appearance, of all things. There’s nothing wrong with her appearance of course. My issues with the movie are its plot holes and lack of originality.

My first gripe is with the origin story of Clark’s cousin. In “Superman,” we found out Clark’s birth parents were sort of evil and wanted their son to conquer Earth and to rule “without mercy.” Luckily, he didn’t get the memo because their message was cut off, so he became a good guy instead.

Now we are told Kara’s parents were awesome and told her to be a good person! Maybe there was a good brother and a bad brother, and Supergirl’s dad was the good one? That’s possible, but they don’t go into that. We are left to puzzle over it. (I know there’s a theory that the “Go conquer Earth” message translation in “Superman” was a lie, but there’s a line in “Supergirl” about Kal-El being sent off to be a conqueror, and anyway one would think Kara would be able to clear up any doubt, as she speaks fluent Kryptonian.)

It’s hard not to compare the two superheroes. The story and plot in “Superman” felt fresh and original, and also timely. But “Supergirl” felt like a mashup of “Guardians of the Galaxy” and “Mad Max: Fury Road.” And not in a good way.

The villains and the fight scenes were sort of boring, Supergirl’s sidekick, Ruthye, was one-dimensional. Her sworn-to-avenge-her-family storyline was very “My name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my father, prepare to die.” And as much as I love Jason Momoa, his character Lobo was extraneous. He could have been removed, and it wouldn’t change the story.

How did all of this pass the first-draft stage? I suspect movie makers don’t expect women superheroes to bring in the big box-office bucks, so they invest less effort in these films. Then when the movies do poorly, they can say, “See we told you, audiences don’t want women superheroes!” (Script writers and directors should study 2017’s “Wonder Woman.” The Patty Jenkins-directed film proved that we can have women superhero movies that don’t suck!)

Another issue I have with “Supergirl” is that, while Kara does help Ruthye and the other kidnapped girls, there’s no follow-up for the girls after they’re freed, because Kara’s main concern is her dog, left paralyzed by the brigands. Krypto spends most of the movie on a doctor’s table, waiting for the heroes to find him a cure, just like Rocket in “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3.”

Maybe I’m being unfair. Kara is younger than Clark, so it makes sense that she’s more immature and self-centered. She also has had childhood trauma which she’s still working out. It’s possible the writers are planning more growth for her in a future film.

I did love seeing Kara and her puppy meeting for the first time, and going to Earth, meeting Superman. Her flaws (and that space scream!) are relatable. I will re-watch the movie. Like I said, I didn’t hate it. But Alcock deserves a better script. (Another note to writers: If you want us to take women superhero movies seriously, don’t use cringey songs like “The Middle.”) I’m holding out hope Alcock will get to play Supergirl again and have a better story the next time around.

Follow Earth to Shawna on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/Earth-to-Shawna-1476049362698628/?fref=ts

Summer picks: ‘Superman,’ ‘Strange New Worlds’

Hey, sci-fi fans – let’s talk about “Superman” and “The Fantastic 4: First Steps.” How cool is it that we got both these movies in theaters this summer?

“The Fantastic 4” is a departure from the Marvel Cinematic Universe’s “Sacred Timeline” (also known as Earth-616).

Our fantastic superhero team lives on Earth-828 – in the year 1964. That’s why their 1964 looks so different and futuristic. They are the only superheroes in their timeline/parallel universe/whatever you want to call it. There are no Avengers there.

Once you wrap your head around that, you can sit back and watch their story unfold.

Their origin story is not the main plot, but it is given in the movie: Reed (Pedro Pascal), Sue (Vanessa Kirby), Ben (Ebon Moss-Bachrach), and Johnny (Joseph Quinn) acquired their powers after a space mission exposed them to “cosmic rays.” They’ve been fighting villains and protecting their planet for years when a supervillain named Galactus enters the picture.

It was entertaining and fun, but like “The Eternals,” it doesn’t feel connected to the MCU. I know it is going to be tied into future Marvel films, however, so I’m looking forward to seeing how that plays out. I’m not really a big fan of the multiverse plot lines, and it’s mostly for this reason that I enjoyed “Superman” more.

I had mixed feelings about director James Gunn switching from Marvel to DC. He made some of my favorite Marvel movies, but when he ousted Henry Cavill (Superman) and Gal Gadot (Wonder Woman), I was bummed out. But he wanted to take these characters in a different direction, so it makes sense to re-cast them.

Gunn gave the Guardians of the Galaxy humor and heart, and he’s brought that same winning combo to “Superman.”

David Corenswet had big shoes to fill, and he did an amazing job as the pure and good Clark Kent/Superman. A model of goodness, hope, and compassion is exactly what we all need right now.

I honestly loved everything about this movie – the characters, the casting, the special effects, the dialogue, and of course Krypto, the adorable mutt with superpowers. (Gunn modeled the dog’s mischievous personality after his own pup!)

I’m also loving Season 3 of “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds” so far. This series was well cast, and I especially love Ethan Peck as Spock.

I was so excited to find out Rhys Darby was added to the cast, but unfortunately, he was only in one episode.

We are halfway through the season, with five episodes left. The finale will be Sept. 11. Season 4 is already in production, and a fifth and final season is expected to begin filming later this year. “Strange New Worlds” is on Paramount+.

My hubby is a huge fan of the “Alien” movies, so we could not pass up an opportunity to see the “ad” for the new “Alien: Earth” TV series on the corner of Hollywood and Vine.

The display features a life-size alien xenomorph and billboards, containment units with buttons and door handles, and sound effects. Here are some of the photos I took when we were in Hollywood last weekend.

The new series, a prequel set two years before the events of the 1979 film, will premiere on FX and Hulu on Aug. 12.

Follow Earth to Shawna on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/Earth-to-Shawna-1476049362698628/?fref=ts

‘The Way of Water,’ ‘Witcher,’ ‘Wonder Woman’ and more

The long-awaited sequel to James Cameron’s epic 2009 sci-fi/fantasy film “Avatar” is finally in theaters. We saw it last night, and we loved it! But not everyone had positive things to say about it. I’ve seen some less than favorable reviews, with critics complaining about the film not being original or deep enough, which I guess is a fair point? The plot is a recycled version of the plot from the first movie, and the characters are clichéd (rebellious teenagers, snarling Marine colonel, etc.).

If you’ve seen the first movie – one of the critics in question admitted she hadn’t – then you know the point is not the story. You aren’t going to see this CGI movie in IMAX 3D expecting to be blown away by the plot. You’re in it because it looks cool. It transports you for three hours to another planet. It’s not “Citizen Kane.”

I know everyone says “Avatar” is a glorified version of “FernGully” or “Pocahontas” but how glorious it is! It’s no wonder the villainous Earth people want to move to Pandora. Who wouldn’t? The water is clean and phosphorescent; the forest is lush and magical.

In this sequel, we are introduced to the reef people, a separate clan from the one in the first film, which introduced the forest people of Pandora. And I know I mentioned in my last post that I have an issue with mer-people but 1) these people don’t have underwater homes so it doesn’t count, and 2) Cameron has said that one of the reasons this was so long coming was because he wanted to get the underwater effects just right, and it looked amazing! It may not be award-winning writing, but visually, it’s just about perfect.

Having said that, I didn’t hate the plot. It’s not subtle in its messages about environmentalism and colonialism, but so what. They’re good messages and bear repeating.

It’s possible this sequel struck a chord because, like me, Jake and Neytiri are now parents of teenagers, so I related to their worries. I was invested; the stakes are high and the action sequences are intense. It was breathtaking but it also had humor, and heart. It’s not going to change your life, but it has everything you want in a sci-fi/fantasy/action movie. If you liked the first one, you won’t be disappointed.

“Avatar 3” is scheduled to be released in December 2024.

Under the Gunn
Patty and Gal

I think I speak for a lot of people when I say, “WTF, James Gunn?” First we find out that he’s not going to direct any more “Guardians of the Galaxy” movies, and now he’s taking over at DC, and the first order of business is apparently to ax the best things DC had going for it: Henry Cavill playing Superman and Patty Jenkins directing the Wonder Woman movies.

Jenkins has reportedly left the third Wonder Woman film over “creative differences.” This came as a shock as the first one was, in this fan’s opinion, DC’s best offering thus far. I can only hope Gal Gadot follows Jenkins to something bigger and better.

Cavill fans were already upset by the announcement in October that he will no longer be playing Geralt of Rivia after Season 3 of “The Witcher,” expected in mid-2023. (Season 4 will feature Liam Hemsworth in the role.) There have been many rumors, but an official explanation has not been given. It was suspected that his return to his Superman role could be the reason. But now we know this isn’t happening either, as Gunn is taking Superman in a different (younger) direction. Cavill announced last week he is working on a “Warhammer” franchise which will be on Amazon. Mystery (sort of) solved.

I don’t know much about “Warhammer” but as long as I get to see Henry in something, I’m happy.

More stuff …
Michelle Yeoh

In other Witcher news, a four-episode prequel miniseries, “The Witcher: Blood Origin,” starring Michelle Yeoh, will be released on Netflix on Dec. 25. I love Yeoh, so I will be watching this one. I was happy to see that she and her wacky sci-fi flick “Everything Everywhere All at Once” have been nominated for Golden Globe and Critics’ Choice Movie awards. Yeoh is also in the aforementioned third installment of “Avatar,” coming in 2024.

If you are looking for something to binge watch, check out the first season of the fantasy series “Shadow and Bone” before the second season comes out March 16. This one is also on Netflix.

One last thing I want to mention is the new trailer for “Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse.” Check it out.

Follow Earth to Shawna on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/Earth-to-Shawna-1476049362698628/?fref=ts